Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Why not treat BU as Alt?
by
RawDog
on 23/03/2017, 12:27:50 UTC
I dont get it.
I have read so much yet I cant still understand.
They say it is an altcoin but alts should have a price right?
Some say it is part of bitcoin, if that is the case then there should not be a price for this or else they will be a competitor.
If they will get their profits through bitcoin only then I can't say they are an alt but more like an option to transact.
Which is it really? Can someone make it clear?

The problem is there will be 2 coins - and the market will decide which one it will attribute more value too.
If people find that BTU implementation suits them, its value might be more than BTC.

Bitcoin Unlimited is 'BTC' - the real bitcoin.

Bitcoin Core is  'BALT' - bullshit alt

Don't let SegWit have the label 'BTC'.  They can change their fucking label too.  People who don't follow the details will mistakenly think 'BTC' is the real or original bitcoin.  BU is the original bitcoin and should take the BTC label.  SegWit is a wild deviation from the original protocol and is the alt coin