You are promoting a flawed and debunked theory, and should feel bad.
Saying it's debunked doesn't actually debunk the subject in question. The following image is clear enough evidence of a composite image and thus fraud that it could stand up in court.
http://i.imgur.com/lHafwPV.jpg Again, you are mistaken.
It is not a composite image.
The outer-most glass has a cross physically etched into the lense.
It is this etching in the glass that causes bright backgrounds to over-expose the particular part of the film, giving the illusion that it is a composite image.
