Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
by
AngryDwarf
on 25/03/2017, 14:29:46 UTC
Quote from: Carlton Banks on March 25, 2017, 01:48:27 PM
Quote from: rav3n_pl on March 25, 2017, 12:51:55 PM
Link to math please, how much data will take 10`000tps in Bitcoin blockchain using this stuff?
Or how much tps you want to scale to?

Transaction encoding improvements: http://people.xiph.org/~greg/compacted_txn.txt

Schnorr: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.msg14011669#msg14011669


On-chain scaling is possible. Blocksizes are not scalable.

Soft fork or hard fork required to efficiently implement these ideas?