...That said I do not have any valid arguments against larger blocks, faster transaction confirmations and lower fees, if solution is graceful, does not destroy Bitcoin brand, rarity and trust of over half of it's users.
What about if it hurts it's current decentralized and unregulatable nature?
Do you think Bitcoin could continue to exist or be valuable without them?
I'm all for on-chain scaling and lower fees too, but not if in 5 years Bitcoin is directly
regulated by governments. Look what China is currently doing to their Chinese Exchanges.
You think they wouldn't do that to the protocol if they could?
Satoshi made Bitcoin to be bigger than a low fee payment system, it was for freedom.
Yes, all valid arguments... What China is doing is already done here in the US.