Where is their peer reviewed paper published in a respectable journal refuting these claims?
Moving the goalposts is a dishonest debating tactic. Don't do it if you wish to be taken seriously.
revans seems to be a master at this. Classic evader, and bears all the marks of the reasoning errors that leads to. Not worth debating, from what I've seen so far (haven't trawled this whole thread). But how much do you need to see to get the pattern?