Your weird theories are a distraction from discussing the real issues. Everyone on both sides of the debates wants more capacity in one form or another. I'm putting you on ignore and suggest others do the same. Sorry.
My theory that arguments need to be scientifically founded to have validity? Not everyone wants more capacity, there are a few rational players that are fine with status quo, Maxwell even recently said something to this regard. Doesn't surprise me at all that you choose to ignore such a point that arguments should be scientifically founded-you don't know what that means. You don't know that arguments CAN be founded in science, and you are one of many posters and people in this community that is loud and opinionated because you have no understanding of the subject.