Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell
by
Hyena
on 26/03/2017, 17:03:02 UTC
I want bigger blocks but without segwit soft fork. I would accept segwit as a proper protocol upgrade though (not as a soft fork). Thankfully BU team is already working on SegWit as a hard fork solution.

I'm proposing a hard fork with 4MB blocks and segwit. No soft fork. Sounds like that meets your requirements.

Yes that would be good. I don't care about BU, roger ver and this whole dumb king of the hill power struggle. I simply want bigger blocks and a proper, clean, elegant protocol upgrade which can only be done as a hard fork. That's actually what I like best about the Bitcoin Classic team. They want to get rid off all the technical debt Bitcoin has accumulated over the years.