You just said changing the Bitcoin block size limit would 'destroy its digital gold properties' and 'would tank the system', then I shown you Satoshi had always wanted to increase the block size limit, a long time ago.
So either Satoshi wanted to 'tank the system' himself, or you are wrong, it can't get any more simpler than that. Going off on another tangent doesn't change that. You lack hierarchical problem solving skill that's why you treat every tangent with equal priority, not knowing once your key argument is proven wrong, the smaller details no longer matter.
Why are you speaking for everyone anyway, from what I've seen, 'everyone' here knows you're a troll.
It's ok, maybe you need the money to put your kids through college or something, I know you're a troll too but I replied you anyway because you presented yourself as a low hanging fruit I could pick to further explain Satoshi's vision.
Satoshi showed how it could be done if we decided to do it, and the subsequent posts were people complaining on how obviously difficult it would be to remove as time went by. Satoshi never responded but assuming he was smarter than the others its obvious that he realized the truth of this too.
He gave the people a pacifier, an example of how it COULD be done, it was nothing more, and there is nothing more in the quote to suggest he implied more. He basically said, "You can change it, but you all just have to agree when and how" and he disappeared and choose not to participate in this debate.
It's important for people to know that the 1MB limit is absolute BS, there is simply no valid reason to keep it at 1M, many top devs used to agree, until they started working for Blockstream.
There is a valid reason and I stated it, that parameter is holding bitcoin's value proposition which guards its properties as a digital gold.
And correlation doesn't imply causation. It's you that is not a dev and isn't educated on the system or experienced with it, calling those that are wrong and betrayers of the philosophy behind it. Why should we listen to you and not the talented experienced people that are ACTUALLY working on the solutions?
All you are doing is telling the engineers how to solve their problems, but who are you?