I don't think you understand what proof means. This is crypto we are talking about, there is objective evidence on the blockchain and that is the only thing that can be trusted. Why should we trust exchanges controlled by the team themselves when we could rely on a trustless system to obtain our proof? It's so simple to do, and the fact you and the team are still fighting this is a gigantic red flag. This struggle you guys are putting up is equivalent to admittance. There is no reason for it except that you need to hide something.

My theory: The ICO did not raise anywhere near 15 mil, but you are going to pretend it did until release, because although you didn't raise 15 mil you have control of the vast majority of the coins because you "purchased" them from the exchanges under your own control. All you need to do is maintain some confidence in the coin until release, and then you can dump to make up for all the money you didn't raise in the ICO.

You could prove that wrong in an instant, but you don't because apparently you can't. And let me make one thing clear, until objective evidence of the ICO funds (the addresses) are shared with the community I will be in here alllllllll the way up until and past the launch making sure nobody who comes here forgets or is unaware that the team has failed to bear their burden of proof and provide this simple and standard degree of transparency that they themselves alluded to before the ICO.

Remember, your own words: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
Qtum declared a successful ICO, I am just denying it