You are correct that I believe that a block size increase is both necessary and valuable, but that is not what my proposal is based upon nor was it something I said anywhere in the proposal. The proposal is a compromise because the vast majority of Bitcoin users and holders think you are the retarded one, just like you think they are. Regardless of whether you are right or not, they are going to severely damage the prospects of Bitcoin if you do not compromise.
You should probably know that I used to vehemently support your argument, day in, day out. Until I spent a month working out the math in great detail and realized that I was arguing for the wrong thing.
This is the same kind of bullshit mudflinging that needs to stop. First you make an appeal to ignorance and mischaracterize other people's arguments, and then you insult everyone who disagrees with you.
Zero proof, sources cited, or any arguments of substance. Much appeal to authority fallacy, yes.
And while committing logical fallacies and being a jackass, you claim the higher ground. Nice.
I hate to break it to you, but you are acting like the garbage that you proclaim to abhor.
This whole thread is riddled with posts by me that cite and quote objective and founded arguments from great economists and accepted academic theory. That I have pointed out that the vast majority of vocal anti-core proponents do not base on of their opinions in such theory is not mudslinging its observable reality. I cited my sources you have simply ignored all of my posts. And then you have called my cited arguments logical fallacies which is ignoring logic. And then you called me a jack-ass which is an ad hominem. And then you have reasserted that I am not citing my arguments which is again absolutely observably not true.