Cheers, yes the tone of the conversation changes when the Ver brigade doesn't get to decide who participates.

It's all proponents of change and especially BU can say, because there is nothing in present day reality to support their claims and they cannot give a date as to when such a terrible fate will happen because it would be a falsifiable claim, and they don't want to make such claims because they will be proved wrong and have no basis for choosing a date.  

You are calling my views religious which is an implication they are not scientific, but the obvious observable truth is that you are not making scientifically founded or falsifiable claims which is by definition subjective belief and not scientific.

And I absolutely expect you to resort to this and bow out because it is your only possible response to someone challenging you to quote accepted economic theory to back up your opinion.

No BU supporters will continue to participate in a discussion in which they are constantly asked to provide citations from accepted economic literature/science because there is no such works to cite that support their assertions/opinions.