Who in their right mind would accuse the government of interfering without solid proof?
Governments operate on the theory of plausible denial ability, so no one is going to see any "proof". You realize the CIA employs "economic hitmen" that take down whole countries, right? Bitcoin would be joke in comparison.
Right. That's that why either you don't squabble with them with a silly petition or tough it up and provide the 'proof'.
Silly waste of time the petition, does more harm than good.
I think the question we should be asking is who had the most to gain by pumping and dumping (seems like "someone" really threw down a lot of fiat about 3 days before the "correction"). Also, who has the vast media influence to make the crash virtually front page news in most major publications around the world in short order?
Instead we have this petition.
It's kind-of like the cops finding no "solid proof" on a cheating, alcoholic, wife abusing husband when his wife comes up dead.
The government is not Bitcoin's husband. A husband has no plausible deniability and they are suspect #1. What's your point?