For every 5 times he claims to be citing theories(and that no one else is / no one but his position does science properly), he actually cites his own comments twice and maybe links to something else once or name drops once. When he does link elsewhere or name drop, he doesn't explain how their writing relates to his, what conclusion he is pushing or what specific point he is referencing.
This is observably and provably false to any objective observer, as this thread is laden with my citations and quote of my sources to my argument and my explanation as to their relevance to my conclusion which is that bitcoin will ultimately because a settlement system for major players and will not be scaled as a coffee money. This poster is a liar and know nothing about macro-economics.
And the circle is closing. OP is right because you are always right (so the rest of our community are liars and do know nothing about ... Choose what you want, its true because we know that we do know nothing). Strict proof, stricter than math could do and so objective!