Well, "increase fee" is one way of putting it. But pledging BTC to him at a steady rate that'd match the 3% of the 50-100% of the network's Bitcoin generation is what I mean.
I get what you mean, but "O Great Overloard Tycho" is not something I like. I dont want to have to pay a HUGE fee just to protect a network that could simply point its hashing power away from Deepbit.
Well, people are right now acting like they're deposing a despot. It'd just be the other side of the same (bit)coin. Hate to see DDoSing hitting all the pools.