I don't know how you could get "There is not really a technical issue" from what I wrote. I think you just made that up in your head.
For the sake of clarity, I think you and many others like you chose to jump for the low-hanging fruit (bigger blocks) that pretends to be a scaling solution for Bitcoin, just because it is quick and dirty, and stands to potentially net a quick return as (stupid) people are fooled into believing the scaling issue is solved.
There is another solution (for those who believe there is a problem) that is clearly technically superior, and which is a lot more likely to allow Bitcoin to remain decentralized and retain its core value proposition. The only way anyone can ignore that is if they just don't care.
I am sure you will disagree with the points I make above, but the technical discussion of this stuff has been beat to death here, and if you don't agree with me by now, I'm sure you never will. I don't expect that you will stop your constant harangue against Blockstream and Core and all the evil you perceive in them. But I hope you will at least take a second to consider what your motivations really are.
if you're referring to LN, i'm all for it, its very exciting technology...but I see no reason we can't have bigger blocks now (actually 2 years ago) and LN later. My beef with BSCore is that they seem to be standing in the way of the 'bigger blocks now' part. Whether that is out of sheer stubborness, or selfishness, or some grandmaster moves that are far ahead of us, and good for all of us, well that's up to you to judge and decide for yourself. My motivations aren't really that interesting. Mostly intellectual stimulation. I believe in what I say but I don't believe I have any real impact. Maybe I will change a few minds here or there and maybe just maybe tip the scales in the group consciousness toward what I believe is the better way to go. Hope I answered your question.