Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell
by
jonald_fyookball
on 31/03/2017, 00:20:47 UTC
Just a reminder. SegWit is a transaction limit proposal, and if activated it will be much harder to increase transaction capacity on chain knowing that post SegWit increases comes with 4X the block weight.  

I would like to understand more about this.  I know that there is a transaction piece and a witness piece, but why can't they simply both be increased
in a linear fashion in the future?  

Quote

here are the economic policies being pushed by incumbent developers - they unanimously support limiting bitcoin transaction:

Quote from: Greg Maxwell
“There is a consistent fee backlog, which is the required criteria for stability.“

Quote from: Pieter Wuille
“we - as a community - should indeed let a fee market develop, and rather sooner than later”

Quote from: Mark Friedenbach
“Slow confirmation, high fees will be the norm in any safe outcome.”


Quote from: Luke-jr
“Reasonable block sizes currently range from ~550k to 1 MB"

Quote from: Jorge Timon
“…higher fees may be just what is needed…”


Quote from: Wladimir J. van der Laan
“A mounting fee pressure, resulting in a true fee market where transactions compete to get into blocks, results in urgency to develop decentralized off-chain solutions.”


ahh the old bandwagon... a tried and true propaganda technique.  works every time.  i mean, they can't all be wrong can they?