So you're not interested at all in why Qtum refuses to provide tx ids or addresses to prove they hold the ICO funds they claim to have collected? Even though they promised to be transparent with their investors? You don't want to know that the funds you invested are indeed safe and where they are supposed to be? This is something all other projects do, so idk how you can say there is no more risk involved in this project vs others based on that fact alone. And isn't this additional risk of the funds not being transparent only amplified further by the fact that the cofounder of this project is known to have stolen funds from a previous one? Seems like a bad combination with obvious implications.