Because @r0ach is an obstinate fool who wears a tinfoil hat blindfold that prevents him from comprehending (and perhaps even reading) what Nash wrote, especially what Nash wrote about what makes gold valuable and why it is not as ideal as Bitcoin.
LOL, not as ideal as bitcoin you say? So by extension you are also claiming gold is not as ideal as dogecoin, clamcoin, solidcoin, asiacoin, and scamcoin4000. Due to lack of scalability, there is no valid Schelling point for bitcoin. But that's besides the point, because even if it did scale, it doesn't do what the whitepaper claims or acts in a decentralized manner in the first place.
Like i told the other hipster earlier:
Money has NUMEROUS different traits that have to be satisfied, and the only trait being so called "digital" helps is it's portability. Congratulations, you have exceled at around 10% of the required traits. Bitcoin is a currency and not money. Just because being digital allows you to dump it fast (portability), does not make it money or superior to anything else.