Re: Why I support Bitcoin Unlimited and hate the wizard alien overlords
UASF is very dangerous, every fork that Satoshi did was user activated, see how they all turned out.
Disagreed. UASF is not that dangerous, especially not 'very dangerous', and even further, not dangerous in comparison to the alternative (BTU 51% attack).The 300GB bandwidth and 2GB RAM it currently requires to run a non-listening node is absolutely nothing at all and an initial sync that can take weeks is perfectly fine. Doubling the block size increases bandwidth by more than double. Clearly 600GB+ bandwidth is nothing for 2MB blocks.
Quadratic hashing - DoS attack. Look it up.Who cares about privacy, security or anti-censorship? those are for those silly anarchist types.
If you don't care about either one of those (assuming you're not being sarcastic), you've come to the wrong place. I advise you to leave Bitcoin immediately and join some centralized shit like ETH or Ripple.The Blocksize limit Satoshi added was very bad. Clearly he was bribed and extorted by the centralized banking cartel to insert this malicious code in to completely obliterate Bitcoin so that they can further their goal of taking over the world with liberal ideology and communism so that the USSR will reign once more. Gavin tried to warn the CIA about what happened, but it was too late, Satoshi shortly vanished after he met with the CIA.
Roger Ver also an extremely trustworthy and upstanding citizen.
Now I see what is going on here. Wasting everyone's time trolling? Roger Ver also an extremely trustworthy and upstanding citizen.
Yes, make a vague post that doesn't respond to any of my points claiming it's all false and throw in a few insults too. Genius, you will be safe from the wizard alien overlords.
There. I should have spent more time initially reading it rather than just skimming through the buzzwords. Shameful troll.