It's another vain attempt to communicate to the core devs to increase the effing blocksize. Nobody seems to be listening.
Personally I'm sick of the cult-like core devotees who claim to be intelligent and technically knowledgeable.
Personally I'm sick of people not being willing to understand or accept that an allegedly 'simple' blocksize increase exposes the network to a DoS risk. Yes it was thought a plain blocksize increase would be fine in the past; now we know better. Does that mean we should plough on regardless, knowing it's flawed?
Are you ignoring the fact that the 1MB blocksize limit exposes the network to a DoS risk AND alienates the user base? Fees and confirmation times rose dramatically over the past 3 months due to the limit. User flight to altcoins is massive, and cannot simply be waved away.
Who is "plowing on regardless"? Unlimited sounds scary, but likely won't win the fork war. Segwit is complicated, and not a proven technology at all.
Keep your eye on Litecoin's Segwit adoption. If we're lucky, Litecoin will activate Segwit and unmask all of those subtle bugs that nobody found during testing... let's talk in 6 months...