No investment in cofund.it will come from Iconomi. They will be running their own ICO to fund the project. They did not want to use Iconomi ICO funds to fund this project as it is not part of the original Iconomi project.
I still don't get it ... why are they having an ICO ?
I mean ... shouldn't they be paid by the provided service?
They want to raise 2mil $ for what ? A web site to present the company? A table to sit around and coach ICOs?
How much money do you need to sit around a table and decide in which ICOs to invest, research on the web about the project, talk with the people having those projects, coach them ... ?
I mean in case of ICONOMI I can understand ... programmers costs ... servers, infrastructure, testing, marketing.
Smells to me like a new way to drain money from the people.
Is it true?
if they are not associated, what exactly is Jani doing in the cofound.it slack then?
He rather communicate in there than in ICONOMI's own slack.
Nope, they are busy working out how to do another ICO so as to rake in millions of dollars again rather than concentrating on getting the platform
ready.
Yeah i do agree on this but it this statement will not satisfy most of the investor due to
#1 : Product not delivered , no profit was shared
#2 : Iconomi changed their dividends to buy back
In order to gain back the purchase power, by deliverying the OFM platform is the first step which the beta has been tested but which required time to check and fix for errorless platform