I am pushing for a FAQ with answers....
That's good to know, Mal. I can see you're taking a more diplomatic approach, and easing into a solution step-by-step....I look forward to seeing how it goes.
If you think my plan includes you sitting on the sidelines as an observer, guess again. I appreciate gadflies and think they will serve a valuable function starting around Step Four.
Say for just a moment that somebody created an ICONOMI FAQ Wiki where stuff could be continually updated by the team / accessed by newbies in a central location. What questions should such a FAQ wiki start with in addition to these?
...
Oh, I'll still get involved. I just look forward to seeing how your own idea pans out overall (assuming I don't tire of my current obsession...
)I won't be placated by half-measures, though, and I won't be the only one.
Making things clearer for newbies is a good move, but there are issues that extend beyond that, as I'm sure you've picked up from reading this thread, and probably thought about yourself.
I'm not sure those concerns can be tagged on to the end of your list there, but I understand that appealing to new investors/customers is a good move, financially speaking.
Current concerns mainly come from early adopters who are feeling a bit shafted. But yes, whether they've been shafted or not, the past can't be changed. We can draw conclusions about the honesty/integrity of the team from that, but your plan is forward-thinking, and hopefully we'll see better communication, transparency, accountability, and consistency, in future.
Step Four indeed