It's not just the instamine. That was just an appetizer to see if it was possible to get some constructive dialogue going with some semblance of professionalism and seriousness when it came to the explanations and answers. It's not just about the instamine; it's about everything!
Instead of raging and screaming about some giant conspiratorial "well organized scheme" let's consider the fundamentals which differentiate Litecoin from Dash.
Litecoin is much older and has a more powerful/secure ASIC PoW network than Dash.
Yes and chinese miners are pumping it now. To sell on newcomers.
Litecoin keeps up to date with hot new features like SEGWIT, while Dash can't even keep up with RBF/CPFP and breaks simple yet crucial things like IPv6 compatibility.
first we have to see it working.
Litecoin is going to have working payment channels like Lightning soon, thanks to SEGWIT. That means InstantX, Masternodes, and Evolution are obsolete digital trash.
LN, SEGWIT, it is for BTC. And when BTC get it, who will need LTC?
Litecoin's creator has DNA from MIT & Google, while Dash's has a sketchy background in finance and a 2 year mail-order degree in web marketing from University of Phoenix.
Litecoin creator comments DASH (very negatively) and DASH creator NEVER go that low.
Litecoin's cobblee does not shill for and pump LTC; Dash's Duffield frequently advertises his project as a legitimate investment without disclosing the risks involved.
This is too stupid to answer
Litecoin was not 20% Instamined in the first 2 days; Dash was. Litecoin never cut total emission to further enrich early miners; Dash did.
Well, Coblee SOLD his 400 000 LTCs. Evan GAVE his 200 000 DASHs. Emision cut is DEFLATORY tool. And we wanted it that way.
Litecoin does not require trusted 3rd party security holes; Dash makes SlaveNode users the playthings of Masternode Ponzi participants.
Masternode sistem is genial idea copied by many many coins. Be careful when use Ponzi word. Don't lie. Litecoin has nothing to copy.
Litecoin doesn't have to keep changing its name like a disgraced over-diluted pink sheet stock; Dash does.
Again: Coblee does not comunicate to community, Evan does, alot. That is how name is changed. And we wanted it that way ( again).
Litecoin is supported by Coinbase and Kraken; Dash is considered a scam and despised by most of the crypto community, and thus will never trade on those exchanges.
Coble is working @ coinbase. Interestingly, LTC suported and DASH not there. Again careful with "scam" word, don't lie.
Litecoin prioritizes technology over marketing; Dash does the opposite.
Nothing done on code for years @LTC, and you say "prioritize"? Again, Coblee made LTC then soon DUMPED his 400 000 LTC stash and said he will not work on it PUBLICLY.
Truth is he did not wor on anything for years. Lately he did put effort to integrate LTC @ coinbase. And that is prioritisinh MARKETING over technology. Don't twist...
Litecoin has a bus factor >>1. Dash keeps losing devs who get wise to Evan 'The Instaminer' Scamfield's long con:
Explain that "bus factor >>1", who, where, what? And with DASH is KNOWN team, larger every day, paid good and working hard. Those (you mean Vertoe? ) who left can cry now. They sold their stash for pennies. I bought some then.
And how you call Evan speaks more about you.
try not to lie and twist facts.
Come on. Give it a shot and start showing with facts just what there is in this litany that is incorrect.
And for you: So much hate coming from you "kind" words...don't bother to hide it.
All facts are @ this tread from page one to here. Well it would be easier to read if trolling was less....