Again, personal attacks because I pointed out that your dividends vs. buyback argument is baseless for one simple reason:
The same amount of profit gets distributed to ICN holders either way. It's the profit itself that gives ICN value, not the distribution mechanism.
I believe I have correctly assessed that you are incapable of addressing the points that have been made.
If you wish to take that personally, so be it.
I already addressed them but you go around in circles and put the focus on me to try to distract from this simple fact:
It's the profit itself that gives ICN tokens value, not the distribution mechanism.
And I explained why that won't work the way you seem to think it will.
Profit via
buybacks = obvious token of value
Theoretical profit via
dividends when we potentially hold no rights/perks = a whole lot of variables/concerns which you can't address
Again, please pass this on to the team. I've saved the page, in case anybody deletes any part of the discussion.
It's been an interesting discussion, though, and I hope to see an official word which will clear up the things we've discussed here.
It's the same amount of profit distributed either way. The biggest difference is a psychological/marketing change that could effect the price of the tokens themselves.