I have read carefully what you have post, and by what presumed in your research, but you can not blame us in not believing you right? just because you got a good research at hand to show us some proofs of who really is Satoshi and I salute you by doing so, but you can not blame me if I am very tired in this kind of topic about satoshi! well sorry for that though and I am still here gonna see this article proceeds because deep in my heart I also am curious in what is the real identity of satoshi if he is just a one man or group in depends on him to share the truth about him.
Why was according to an eyewitness, Nash's taxi "firebombed"?
Why was this
one month before @traincarswreck's coindesk article came out linking Nash to Satoshi? The implication is that someone was observing that our community was getting closer to DOXXing Satoshi.
Well if we are nearly getting a hunch on who satoshi really is and Coindesk was one that reports about the activity of Nash then Nash might be satoshi and I think a lot of the news on coindesk was really legit, but in terms with the satoshi topic a lot of people are really not buying it. I think because even if they are curious on who satoshi really is, a lot doesn't really care at all but a condolences to Nash family may he rest in peace.