Greg Maxwell on the other hand stands to profit handsomely if Bitcoin becomes a settlement layer, regardless of the damage done to Bitcoin as a result of this.
Prove it.
Blockstream, of which Maxwell is an officer of, stands to profit from Bitcoin becoming a settlement layer. Settlement layer solutions are literally Blockstream's only products.
That is no proof of any kind. You've just made a more definitive statement which comes to clarify the previous one.
Why don't you enlighten me?
Let's start with some basics. How exactly does
communist China operate? Once you follow that trail, you will possibly reach a fine amount of evidence.
However, the sums I quoted were each of their likely current Btcoin holdings, of which would be very difficult to liquidate, even at fire sale prices. In order for either of them to realize the value of their bitcoin holdings, Bitcon's adoption needs to increase substantially.
There is no proof that either one of them have major Bitcoin holdings.
He acted this way a decade ago, he behaved this way in Bitcoin's early days, he behaved this way 4 years ago, and there is evidence to support that he is still engaging in these behaviors today.
Source for the latter 3?