A few topics/replies for consideration

Concerns re: carbon credit/green projects
- I do think people are fair to raise concerns e.g. TheTruthIsOutThere
- And I do think people are also fair to raise supporting points e.g. McDoxy1

Here's the thing:
- In any barrel of apples, there's always going to be some bad apples - it would be unfair to paint the whole industry with the same brush.
- However, where questions need to be raised, or additional investigation needs to be performed - I think that's fair.  One should always do due diligence (seems often unheard-of in the crypto world).
- The EcoBit team is not going to close their ICO in 10 days - there is an extended ICO period.
- I think the next 60 days (or 57 days, to be precise) is where tough questions should be asked by others (and answers shared by the EcoBit team).  EcoBit team members will certainly jump in here to make clarifying statements.  If you get an answer from direct communications, share it here.  The more information that is shared with everyone, the better the judgment all can arrive at.

The EcoBit team is not shirking any responses, and they respect that people may have warranted concerns.  The questions raised online - are no less difficult than the questions raised in their offline fundraising. You should not hesitate to ask questions, but try to keep them claim-free so that the answers can be evaluated objectively.

Concerns re: promoters

Sir - with all due respect - that is an assertion that needs to be proven. If that is indeed the case, you should provide documentary evidence rather than an online statement.  Am sure that will also give comfort to other prospective investors.  Again, the EcoBit team will not shirk from responding - but do provide supporting evidence.