I don't necessarily claim that my system is fool proof, and I doubt that my system is even as close to as systematic as Martingale betting - and possibly even the odds of martingale betting are better than my odds - in the long run.  So, I am not really arguing that my system has fool proof odds.  I am merely asserting that there is a considerable amount of difference between systems, and anyone who is betting 100% balls to the walls is playing a quite different system than I am playing - and it seems quite ridiculous to me to attempt to argue a minimization of the difference and to assert that alls systems are all the same (or nearly the same).