Those guys can't even write proper english, and they think they have enough understanding of coding and so on to defy the opinion of 100% of experts in the field. Looks like common sense doesn't add up. He is just testing his twitter-influence over price again. Miners are really good for nothing goons.
Well, though I personally do not discriminate people who could not speak or spell English well, I am with you that the guy must be lacking some form of a common sense. I don't think we should be listening to this guy as he could just be adding up to the confusion happening right now in Bitcoin. I understand that miners are really profit-oriented but it should not mean that they should kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Anyway, this is just my opinion and my opinion will not really matter at all in the broader Bitcoin community.
I don't personally discriminate retards as well, but for some reason I have not yet seen ONE proper technical answer on why SegWit is superior and is worth all these trouble to push it through. Not even one.
The explanations I've read are always based on he said she said, or some kind of chart and graph that's base on numbers that either don't mean anything, or can be easily faked.
When it comes to the actual technical detail on why SegWit is superior, there are none. Look at the idiot above you, I asked him a simple math question and he can't even answer, yet he's selling SegWit like his job depends on it.
SegWit supporters can't all be retarded, there has to be someone who can offer the technical explanation. But where are they? Why are they so hard to find?
I know
FlexTrans is superior to SegWit, because it actually fixes a lot of problems SegWit doesn't fix. Just read it, once you compare SegWit with FlexTrans you'll instantly understand why SegWit is a piece of shit, and FlexTrans is only one of the many alternatives.
So why is SegWit being pushed through like it's the only solution, when it's clearly inferior?
Can anyone here give me a proper technical answer?