Where I don't agree with you is that bitcoin is designed by the "global elite" because apart from a gambler's token, it is not going to go anywhere that can interest the "global elite".
You have entirely ignored everything. Amazing. It is like you have selective reading comprehension. You are clearly in a massive state of cognitive dissonance.
I already told you that I think it is you who are suffering from that, simply because you are too much invested in that view, without which most of what you do would run the risk to be reduced to something of lesser importance than you are willing to conceive.
I'm not designing something that has to stop the evil future masters of the world (bitcoin), and I'm not the one wanting to change the world. You need bitcoin to be designed by an evil genius, in the hands of the world elite, with a mega evil master plan that you can outplay in order for your work to be of the importance you want it to be. So you need bitcoin to be the evil future domination after fiat finance has collapsed, at the right time scale so that your design has had the time to have overcome that devil's plan. I don't. I couldn't care less. I simply don't care about the world, and yes, one day I will be "slaughtered" and I couldn't care less, either. That's part of life.
My altcoin project doesn't depend in any way on Bitcoin being evil, perfect, or flawed. My project is about helping us share our knowledge production without being hostage to 3rd parties. It only depends on BTC being available as an exchange mechanism to and from fiat.
That is another example of your cognitive dissonance. You invent delusions that don't exist. You demonize things in your mind, because you said you want to not care. Not caring is your psychological defense mechanism because you've said you hate society-at-large.
As such, the probability that you are suffering from cognitive dissonance is quite higher than the probability that it is me. I am not invested into this.
You are not invested and thus not expert, as I have clearly shown by your numerous technical errors w.r.t. blockchain design.
I am invested and am more expert than you.
I have also shown I am more knowledgeable than you about economics.
And I don't have hate for society-at-large and have no need to protect myself psychologically by wanting to not care.
Thus you computed the probabilities incorrectly.
I'm just putting elements on the table. Yes, it might very well be that Nash was an evil genius working for the Rothschilds when he was 80 years old,
I've stated I don't think Nash was necessarily consciously working for the elite. Yet the fact is he was traveling around the world selling the concept of an IPCI which is precisely the weighted basket that has been floated by the elite for the SDRs of the NWO. I suspect he was unwittingly involved, or was outsmarting his handlers (in case you've forgotten, the theory would be in that case he would know that Bitcoin would enable altcoin experimentation).
has made a cryptographic design that violates about every rule of good design
You continue to write BS that just isn't true. It doesn't matter how many times you repeat lies, they are still lies.
You are damn close to being permanently ignored by me because I've refuted your allegations and you continue to repeat the lie after you've been informed as to your errors. So this is disingenuous crap.
has enabled you to be the hero that will save the world by outsmarting that mathematical and economical genius, John Forbes Nash, and building a system that will kill his devil's machine.
Ah so the entire thing is jealousy. I got it now. Goodbye.
You're so jealous that you'd conflate my project which entirely independent of Bitcoin (except as an exchange for the token and the token is a minor aspect of the value).
No my project won't defeat Bitcoin. The knowledge age will eventually defeat fungible money, but my project is but one part of a natural evolution that was going to happen any way. I just want to be part of it.
I'll pay you a beer if you were right (and I won't pay it in bitcoin) in 2025 and if both of us are still alive.
I won't have time for your silly beer. Besides I don't drink alcohol.
And frankly I want nothing more to do with you.
But you see that your stake in this is way way higher than mine.
You got that wrong. Lol.
My stake in my project is higher yes. But I don't have any particular need for Bitcoin to be flawed or evil. Much better if it wasn't a threat. I think it would be much better to do my project in a world where there isn't some potential conflict ahead.
This is why I think that I can be more open-minded about these things that you are. I'm not saying that I know better.
How can you be open-minded when you are a lunatic who hates society-at-large and wants to not care about anything because that is the way you've been protecting your psychology and coping with your life.
But the fact that you reply with judgements of my sayings, person and intelligence, rather than with rational arguments,
You lie about my rational arguments.