Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.
You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.
Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are
The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected.