and they are not chasing him so they never will

the case was never wright, they did not like wright and it was all the companies

So, there is noting.

AND Civil means they COULD take propoerties and wright is not selling so it seems...

He stiil owns multiple p[roperties whether he is in Aust or NOT

and wright was before the gaar pannel and he won... so what to thast. He has left and it is not a fraud if he said it and they rejected

and as for deported, they can revoke a passport - they do not need criminal for that

They could bankrupt him if it was him and not a co he owned... so, you say all this and it is all crap

So