Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: MegaDice.com - 0.9% edge Dice, 26 High End Slots, Bet on the House
by
game-protect
on 17/04/2017, 12:19:33 UTC
Is it possible that Rakki N.V. never owned satoshidice.com domain in the first place? The domain leased out to Rakki N.V. who hosted the game with Satoshidice brand. Later the owner of the domain gets a better deal from bitcoinvideocasino, and Rakki N.V. moves out to a new domain with Megadice brand?

This is the best theory so far. It explains that there was no need to move the cold storage too.
This theory is absolute nonsense, because the operator of the website need to have access to the cold storage to pay larger wins and not the domain holder who lease it to the operator. Hence, an absolute brain wash theory! Roll Eyes

The theory was that the domain was never owned by the current smooth operators. Are you saying that the cold storage was handled by whoever had/has the satoshidice domain? Proof?
Yes, the owner and operator of the satoshidice.com domain must have handled the cold storage, because the operator has to pay possible huge winnings from the cold storage, because the operator has to refill the hot wallet from the cold storage, if required!

- If A) is owner of the satoshidice.com domain and leases it to the operator B), for what did operator B) pay $12 million?

- If operator B) leased the satoshidice.com domain, why would they invest time and money to make a foreign satoshidice.com domain more valuable?

- O.k., in the case of SatoshiDice, the operator destroyed the value of the domain. Why would the owner of satoshidice.com lease his very valuable domain to a foreign operator who then destroy the value of his domain?

Despite of all the above mentioned points, it does not make any sense that an online gambling operation lease a domain from a third party. The operator of a website would either buy the domain or pay for the redirected traffic to his own domain.