Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."
Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.
Why so rude?
Everyone has the right to express their opinion.
But I'm not sure that scientists will publish such evidence even if they exist. It will change the world too much. And cause a resonance in society
That was my opinion about your hypothesis that you repeatedly posted and nobody even took the time to say how dumb it is. I did not say you don't have the right to express your opinion, I just said it's as dumb as a rock. Notice one thing: the fear that the whole world will go nuts if there is concrete proof of a deity. In the meantime, apologists claim there is a God. They also claim that nobody would ever publish evidence of a God because that would blow up the society so what they interpret as proof is good but nobody would ever recognise it because they fear the change. But that proof would only make us sure that there is a God. At the moment, most of the human beings are already sure that there is a God, without having any proof or evidence of such a thing. So why would the proof be something bad? I'll tell you why: because there is no proof. All the apologists know there is no proof, all these cultist fuckers are aware their proof is complete bullshit so all they have to do is make it look like the scientists, the governments, the media, would never allow such proof to be seen because it would cause instability. That's the only thing apologists can do, blame some people for not publishing their bullshit, creating conspiracies. Deep down they all know it's all bullshit. The hypocrisy of apologists like you or Badecker is that you guys know it's bullshit but you let it be so, because people need to believe in something. You don't respect human beings, you consider yourselves above and you think people need your lies to be better. I've seen many like you, I've even seen apologists who don't believe a single word in the bible but claim that people must follow the teachings of Jesus. Not them, but other people. That is why I am so rude, because all of my curse words can never make up for the shameless insults you bring against all humanity with your hypocrisy and lack of morality. Are you pleased now, apologist?