- @iamnotback is absolutely convinced that Satoshi is Nash
You continue to lie. You're a habitual liar. How many times have I written I don't think Satoshi was Nash, but I think "Nash may have been UNWITTINGLY involved".
I hope you know the definition of the word UNWITTINGLY.
I dunno.
I only remember this:
Probably your "refutations of my technical arguments" are of the same kind
"how many times have I written that I refuted your technical arguments" Remember, I'm only here to learn stuff. For myself. That's all that matters.