Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the fact that atheism doesn't really exist,
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.
by saying that you were talking about atheism in your post,
but by not showing much, if any, atheism in your post at all.
Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.
Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?
If you did, others would be using your evidence.
I guess they see you as the fool you are.
Did you ever think about taking a science night class, just so that you can learn enough about science law to see that you can't contradict it?
I don't expect that you would admit that science proves that God exists, even if you learned how to understand science. But at least you would know.
As for atheism, even you easily understand that it doesn't exist. How do you know this? Because you haven't checked out all the places on earth or in the universe just to see that God doesn't exist in one of them.
What you have is something that is like atheism, but isn't atheism. Probably what you have is just ignorance, or else it is downright lies. I like to give the benefit of the doubt wherever possible. But you express the things you express, so often that I think we all understand that you are simply a liar.
Your ignorance is unbelievable. You talk about science and insist that Earth is 6000-7000 years old.
The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.
Science clearly showed that Earth is much, much older. So admit your Bible got it wrong. Science got it right, again.
The Bible record is eye witness accounts, and is way more accurate.
Counting tree rings or dark and light layers in ice cores is not rocket science.
You can count past 7000 can you? Unless you think Bible forbids counting past 7000 I don't know what can possibly stop you. Maybe you are not allowing this evidence because this would mean another thing is wrong in the Bible.
Truth is truth. It does not matter what the holy books say.
Truth is truth. It does not matter what the holy books say.
The truth is that science that suggests the age of the earth beyond the 4,500 to 5,000 years that we can measure by examining pottery and buildings, is flawed science. Why? Because there are too many assumptions in that science. And most of the assumptions are, essentially, wild guesses.
Consider mitochondria and the age of the earth - http://creation.com/mitochondrial-eve-and-biblical-eve-are-looking-good-criticism-of-young-age-is-premature and https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mitochondrial-genome-mutation-rate/. Mitochondria shows that all people who have had their mitochondria tested came from the same, one woman. It also shows that she lived 6,000 to 6,500 years ago.
EDIT: Why is it that you can't stay on topic? You should be talking about your stupid atheism that even you proclaim is flawed. Since you won't do this little thing, you essentially show that you have something to hide... that atheism is a religion, and that you hate it.