Re: Scientific proof that God exists?

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Cool

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

Cool

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

You're a kinda sad specimen of humanity. At least stats and af_newbie attempt to break the proof for God down a little. More than likely you can't even read it. What? Does your mama browse the Internet for you? No step-by-step rebuttal of the proof at all!

I certainly support your yakety yak against me and the proof. Since you don't have anything except yakety yak, you are shown for what you are >>> a rambling stooge for some idiot group of idiot atheists. As Han Solo said, "Laugh it up, Fuzzball." All the way to idiot stardom.

We like it. We like it. Grin

Again, the proof for the existence of God links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Cool

I would gladly attempt to break the proof of God if there was any. Assumptions and interpretations do not belong to the 'proof' section, they belong to the belief section. As a result, the shit that you keep on posting is not proof, it's something that you heard from Bob Dutko's cds and it needs no 'step-by-step rebuttal' (funny how you overuse exactly these words that Bob Dutko overuses when he's pissed off at people laughing at his moronic ideas). Also, you trying to become a bit aggressive is pathetic and only demonstrates how desperate you are in proving you own the truth. Exactly like any other apologist. My conclusion is and will be the same untill you come up with some decent stuff and stop acting like a bitchy, dumb apologist: fuck off and come back when you really thought about something. We can do this for a long time by the way. It's up to you when you drop the bullshit and start being serious.