Not sure what you consider to be "good" in that conversation. None of Arthur's questions about the protocol's alleged "self-evolving" properties are actually being answered. The first set of answers just harps on how OWL is great and lands itself well to formal verification, and has got a vast library of ontologies. And the second answer abruptly bails out of the conversation using a very lame "apple and oranges" reason.
BOS was a scam ico token, we are not talking about it. We are talking about what u turned ur life into after stopping to date ur farther. I know u loved him. If u wanna pick up a fight I'm all in. I can make a quick anthology. Protocol u are banging on about was developed by those that work for my company. Nobody of them has even heard of arthur or any of other dubious characters that u seem to be referring to in ur statement.