Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
As you mentioned fucking assholes
Your very first post on this thread 21 April 2016
nuff said
Your very first post on this thread 21 April 2016
nuff said
What's your point and who's "nuff"?
I think it's truly amazing that a year later all they've really done is a somewhat working wallet, although it took two clones to achieve that.
The game (singular) seems to be shit, judging by abysmal levels of interest.
I'm sure that's not what you were trying to say with that screenshot though. What is it then? Use full sentences.
1. What is ROI of masternode?
2. What is masternode earning calculation formula?
3. Is there masternode stats page?
4. How many masternode exist?
5. What kind of unique technology is here in comparison to Dash or PIVX and masternode?
2. What is masternode earning calculation formula?
3. Is there masternode stats page?
4. How many masternode exist?
5. What kind of unique technology is here in comparison to Dash or PIVX and masternode?
1: 19.5 Months your MN makes $400 a month. At the current price ove $7800 per masternode (All these prices changes on a per min basics)
2: ((Total Block per day X CurrentMasterNodeRate (11.5) ) / TotalMasterNodes ) * Price Per Ion
3-4: http://masternodes.ionomy.com
5: I dont know much about the tech it self maybe someone else can answer that.
Reward is going down to 8.5 ION in the next few weeks.
And no, there is nothing special about the tech. It's a 100%-premined transfercoin clone.
My point is you were full of shit a year ago and a year later your still full of shit
ION is a 100% premined transfercoin clone...... come on don't be such a dip shit you can do better than that
https://github.com/ionomy/ion/wiki/ION-Technical-Whitepaper
What suchmoon was quoted as saying was correct.
It is a clone of transfer coin for its mk2 inception.
It was also a 100% premined coin. A small percent of that premine went toxpy conversion but it doesn't change the blockchain proof that the initial allocation of the coin was all a premine i.e. 100%. The masternodes etc generate coins after that... but that is based on the premine coins which generate more.
If you look at the amounts in the initial premine the majority went to the team. The rewards so far given away for bounties are quite small i'd honestly guess around 1% if that. Also the team is running masternodes etc to increase holdings competing against the purchasing base.
That's the truth. State why this is incorrect and back it up Korvas because your comment about suchmoons statement being full of shit I I believe completely wrong.
My point is you were full of shit a year ago and a year later your still full of shit
ION is a 100% premined transfercoin clone...... come on don't be such a dip shit you can do better than that
https://github.com/ionomy/ion/wiki/ION-Technical-Whitepaper
ION is a 100% premined transfercoin clone...... come on don't be such a dip shit you can do better than that
https://github.com/ionomy/ion/wiki/ION-Technical-Whitepaper
I'm sorry that my photoshopped opinion from a year ago didn't meet your high standards, and still doesn't a year later. Perhaps I'm not cut out to be a deluded bagholder, so sad.
And yes, ION is a transfercoin clone and is 100% premined. Do you have any proof to the contrary?
The whitepaper you linked to confirms the 100% premine. Github confirms transfercoin fork:
https://github.com/ionomy/ion
There is/has been lots of dev going on since the fork, hell we fixed some major issues with transfer coin that they adapted. You state that its a 100% pre-mined, wouldnt that mean there are no more coins to be staked? There was a chunk that were pre-mined for development and bounty's, but was a small amount compared to the total coin count.
Big... all coins initially were premined. A premine means the initial mine before the normal operation. Coins that don't have a premine have a block reward from the get go. Ion was 100% premined. Some did go to xpy conversion but it was still premined... to ignore this statement means you'd prefer logical fallacies to reality. Also compared to the amount given to xpy trade in and purchase the team ownership was enormous..... The team also commits the premine they have to masternodes etc so competes against their user base even the ones they sold ico coins to. Its a bit double dipping greedy. And the bounties... well not much has been paid in the way of that from what I see.
Do you understand whats meant by premine now? A premine doesn't equate to no future coins made its simply the mine before normal mining.. ion has no mining only staking and masternodes so it relies on the premine to generate new coins and move the blockchain along. The team owns the majority of that movement.