Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
by
BADecker
on 21/04/2017, 16:20:57 UTC
However, my hope is way beyond yours. Why? Because you can't even rebut the proof that God exists, and that atheism is a quasi-religion.

Cool

You think we are any different?  We are both humans.  We both will die and decompose.  There is no life after death, no matter what you believe while you are alive.


Of course we are different. I understand science proof. but you don't.

In your case, you would try to ignore God even if you understood the proof of His existence.

Since God is the primary driving force holding the universe in place, you will force yourself out of existence by attempting to ignore Him. I, on the other hand, will rise up to live forever by embracing God.

Big difference between us!

Cool

You believe in some made up story about how the world was made.  I believe science is the best way to discover the unknowns of this universe. 
Wrong. Science shows that virtually all of the "old earth" sciences are simply interpretations. These sciences can be interpreted to show a young earth if looked at in other ways. Google "young earth" to see what I mean. One result is https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/the-10-best-evidences-from-science-that-confirm-a-young-earth/.



You use some ancient myths to modify them to suit your needs. I don't. 
I am not aware of doing this. However, it is apparent that you use some young, untried, un-thought-out myths to suggest that many unknowns are fact.



You believe Earth is less than 7000 years old. I don't.  I know it is 4.5 billions years old.
You know it in your imagination and belief. Therefore, it is a religion for you until it is proven.



You believe 'God' created man from dirt/clay.  I don't.  I know we are the product of evolution over billions of years.
You continually show that you are not quite honest by making false claims about me. I believe that God formed man out of the dust of the ground, and breathed into him the breath of life.

Additionally, scientific evaluation of evolution, using probability math, shows that evolution is completely impossible. Cause and effect show that there is no random effect, randomness that would be necessary for mutations to exist as evolution. Irreducible complexity shows that critical stages of the evolution idea are missing, thereby moving evolution into the realm of never being able to be proven.



You are deluded.  I am sane.

That is the difference between us.

Thank you for letting me show everyone how you have a different and deficient definition of the word "sane."

The thing you have is a religion. Why? The foundations for it are proving that it is false. The only way it is truth to some slight extent is that you believe in it.

If you continue with your delusion, now that you have been shown that it is a delusion, it will gradually drag you into a position of lunacy.

Cool