https://github.com/UASF/bitcoinThe only ironic thing here is that the UASF implementation is already much more advanced than BU is. BU is based on outdated Bitcoin Core code (0.12.x).
lol try reading the code and documentation
plus you are obsessed with the reddit bu vs.. debate. there are MANY dynamic block implementations.
i know your finally realising something i have said months ago. but things have moved on since.
but to address your issues with BU because you brought it up..
unlike it taking months to get core to update their issues when core moved from 0.12-0.13..
bu patched cores 0.12 issues in a quicker time. its just that segwit as a SF 2 merkle half gesture is a cesspit creating network so bu havnt just thrown in the 2 merkle segwit half baked code.
In other words, SWHF does not imply a 4 MB block size limit (as opposed to the SWSF 1 MB base && 4 MB weight). It retains the same 1-to-4 ratio that the soft fork variant has.
and thats a failure of using an opportunity to do a proper peer network upgrade..
maybe if you read code and documentation and the terms like hardfork consensus.. you would see that a peer network of a 1 merkle block where everyone is on the same level is possible due to everyone needing to upgrade