The question is, who can make a proper determination about when expressing Christianity is taking it to far? since salvation of souls is the object?
When wicked people start posting evil stuff like this:
So, the best way we can help locked-in (won't change) sodomite unbelievers, and all locked-in unbelievers, is to execute them as fast as possible.
Take a sit down in the corner, drink a coffee and sober up BADlogic, before you injure yourself and/or others. You're intoxicated up to the eyeballs with Christianity. A period of abstinence is needed.
Remember:
Moderation - Good.
Over-indulgence - Bad.
If you saw a person who was in excruciating pain, and would never have a chance to get out of the pain, wouldn't you think about mercy killing? There are lots of people who think about it. And there are even doctors that help their patients with suicide because of it.
We don't know for sure who is a locked-in unbeliever. But if we could tell, wouldn't you want to execute them so that they would receive less eternal agony in Hell? I mean, if there wasn't any chance that they would turn and be saved, why let them live longer so that they do more evil to get punished for throughout all eternity. Mercy killing!
Perhaps you should consider the seriousness of not turning to Jesus salvation. The picture of the pains of Hell that I might paint should be scaring you into examining the facts clearly. After all, you don't know for a fact that I am entirely wrong. And what if I am not only right, but am not even expressing the hundredth part of how bad it will be?