.....
Let me.cite a bit for the sake of ease:
December 2016 CIA report....
Problem is, you are not citing anything but the content of an alleged report. You are not citing the report. I'm not even sure it matters if you were.
Everyone's aware that the Demos have obsessively harped on the "Russian angle."
Everyone will agree that the Wikileaks releases, showing the true nature of Hillary and her criminal associates, influenced the election.
But nobody has to agree that the material was given to Wikileaks by the Russians. There does not seem to be evidence for that. You seem to think "someone said it says so in a CIA report" is evidence. It isn't.
I personally find Julian Assauge's story about where the material came from more believable.
Dude, wake the fuck up, man.
I cited Wikipedia, that was clearly stated.
And man, this shit isn't alleged, this is an intelligence report produced by your country. You can not accept the shit, but that does not make it go away. You are free to take the word of an enemy of the state over all intelligence agencies in your country, it speaks to your intellectual stubbornness. I'm not making this shit up. These are the unfortunate facts, I don't want to deal with this shit as much as you.
Remove your fingers from your ears, Spendulus.
Is the entire Intelligence community Democratic?/
I waited to see how this member reacted.. and now I have my answer.
Greenbitz, the cia report you cite has no credibility.. have you read it? Did you know it was a repackaged report from several years ago when there was no election taking place?
It was redone with little change to serve a fake news purpose. So yes our own intelligence agency is making and selling fake news and you bought it.
They can produce such fake news since the smith-bundt act was blocked when the NDAA was reauthorized in concert with executive orders domestically..
..obviously the deep state is pushing the US into a war and Trumps supporters do not want to go
We have some very smart people reading here so please consider posting primary and secondary sources only for review if you wish to be taken seriously.
Calling names and using social pressure tricks will only make you seem like a deep state shill. And BTW the term "deep state" is not a term of endearment... never has been... thanks for playing!