I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...
Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...
Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.
atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron
...and some more.
Read the proposals
https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.
Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.
Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.