Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Ok, that's valid. Let's have a serious convo here, for real. I feel that WildSharks question was valid. Do you not find it a little disturbing how quickly psionic jumped all over him when he was just asking a question to make sure things were on the up and up? I feel what he asked is what the whales should be asking. The way psionic jumped all over him is reminiscent of the "old days" (see, I didn't bring up coin names, I'd like to have a serious discussion here)
The question Wild asked was MOOT based on the fact the reason for starting the initiative was to help solo Developers. The discussion of this was over 3 days in the making with no profit to be made off of the MN that would of been created. The question is a valid one but MOOT if you where paying attention to what the initiative was about. Now Psionic got mad cause he tried to start something to help the community and it gets trashed by someone who was not even apart of it in the end. So here we are with no Initiative and 2 people mad. (This is my personal view of this)
Trashed?
Ok, so Shark perhaps could have asked his questions in a less trolly way. But he didn't, that's Shark FFS. And all this sounds just like Garza's "be respectful" rule, which he applied copiously to dissenters but never to himself. Considering how much vile shit is being peddled by psionic and other ion-prefixed "members" on slack and elsewhere, blowing a fuse over a "moot" question by one of their own whales on the grounds of it being "insulting" is truly Garza-level hypocritical. So is the "good guys, bad guys" fallacy.
But hey, every bagholder seems to be happy with this attitude that questions are the problem, and not the lack of answers. So what do I know.
