Re: Antbleed: A remote shutdown backdoor in antminers

Quote from: leopard2 on April 27, 2017, 10:37:34 PM

Godwin's law has been fulfilled, almost.

I now assume you are a shill, after all, calling critics racist is exactly what a shill would do to push his agenda. Thank you for the clarification.

I've warned you already. You didn't listen to my posts; could have saved yourself some time.

Quote from: franky1 on April 27, 2017, 10:47:54 PM

Quote from: Lauda on April 27, 2017, 10:35:52 PM

Franky on ASICBOOST exposure: All is good. Ignore temporary drama.
Franky on AntBleed exposure: All is good. Ignore temporary drama.
Franky when someone mentions SegWit: "DOOMSDAY. TEMPORARY GESTURE. BLOCKSTREAM. BOMBS."
Cheesy

lol
lauda you make me laugh

segwit end user features that core promise and promote are the empty promise temporary gesture. but the tier network and control is less than temporary.
PS read the core code and documentation about biasedly rejecting blocks and disconnecting from nodes purely out of version bias, not out of rule validity.

Ironically you still don't even understand my post yet claim to read and actually understand the code (not even in fantasies). Both ASICBOOST and AntBleed are evil. Until you are willing to both accept and admit this fact, you are obviously very biased and/or paid. Politics and scaling aside, the statement about A&A is factual.

Quote from: Hydrogen on April 27, 2017, 10:53:01 PM

Its hard to tell what's true or not, but antbleed being associated with antpool which is one of the largest supporters of bitcoin unlimited.

It's very easy to see what's true. It takes <30 seconds. Stop shit posting for your campaign.