It wouldn't matter if bitmain only produced 40% of the miners for Bitcoin, that's still a lot of miners being produced by 1 company and if said company is shady that's a problem.
If bitmain is blocking changes to Bitcoin to protect some secret advantage, that's a problem for ALL of us.
If bitmain has the ability to remotely kill their miners and their miners make up a significant amount of total miners in use, that's a problem for ALL of us.
It is undisputed that they have a lot of influence in the Bitcoin world.
Does it matter if bitmain is shady? The answer should be yes. It should matter a lot, at least to those who wish to see bitcoin prosper.
BTW, bitmain doesn't dispute the 70% producer of miners, why are you trying to?
funny part is now your dfending keeping PoW running because killing off 'if 40%' to If 70% would be bad...
hmmmmm
so i should quote you above everytime you mention UASF good or time to change PoW
i do find it funny that one minute mining is bad then asic mining is good
when overall its just social drama to distract the real debate of the code of the bitcoin network that wants to change the network to a cesspit of a tier network
Are you having some kind of meltdown dude, I can't understand what your trying to say?