Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address
by
jonald_fyookball
on 01/05/2017, 17:19:02 UTC
Historically wasn't the original design to send to the public key as the destination - there was no hash in the original design?

Then, in order to save space, the whole hashing to a public address was added on top?

That was my understanding - which is often flawed when it comes to esoteric history.

My understanding was that there's additional benefits to hashing the pubkey.  For example, if a wallet implementation was flawed and used a bad 'k value'.