... you'd be better off coming up with a use case that stimulated demand ...
Fads are merely ways to entice investment and increase volume and MC.
I totally agree that we have to give the market what it wants, or else we can be right but if nobody sees it - we will be right and also be very lonely.
A masternode coin is still not to be considered a 2.0 token, am I right? Are we sure this is what the market wants; I see a lot of 2.0 forks at the top of Coin Market Cap.
Well i see now evergreen announce masternodes and they are rising. Just a solid road map annoucement can work wonders for some volume and interest.
Of filling all areas of interest would be more useful too
governance , anon, dev funding mechanism...
If you can then extract enough funding and find the dev with enough skill to implement other features...
what 2.0 features are you looking at?
Masternode is just a way to incentivise accumulation and holding. Give people a target to aim and and a reason to hit it.
I mean just a show of interest and involvement from the devs and on this thread is good... i see my plan to accumulate some more at 5k just vanished in smoke. Been hitting 20k now and staying in the teens.
Let the project look dead and stale it will die.
The 124k wallet troubles me. That should have been burned and rightly so.
They need to donate at least half to the dev fund or face it getting burned. These can then be sold on OTC here in the thread and kick start the dev team.