It was not a classical survey. The idea was presented to different people over a longer period (from the early beginning when we came out with the idea). Then the results (i.e. positive, negative, other) were bookmarked, some were lost. We never tried to analyze the data in statistical sense since the overal impression was very good. To be honest, we didn't have time to do that. And what is more important, after the announcement, the (positive) reponse on different forums (our subjective assessment) is consistent with survey.

Someone may say that it was very amateurish. We believe in the results of the survey (although they confirm our beliefs). Its is known fact that the results of the survey can be manipulated or one can get incorrect results by misinterpretation of input data (»s..t in, s..t out«).

Iztok